![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > What's the reason not to just use DECLARE_SEM and DECLARE_SEM_LOCKED? I still don't see the reason for _any_ of these changes. There's one big reason to stay with what we have: it's always better to not make changes unnecessarily. That's a BIG reason. It's the _changes_ that need to have strong arguments for them as actually buying us something. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-17 08:38 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||