[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    David Howells <> wrote:

    > No, they're not. LL/SC is more flexible than CMPXCHG because under some
    > circumstances, you can get away without doing the SC,

    Of course, CMPXCHG doesn't have to store either, though it still performs a
    locked-write-cycle on x86 if I remember correctly.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-16 12:34    [W:0.018 / U:12.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site