[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
David Howells <> wrote:

> No, they're not. LL/SC is more flexible than CMPXCHG because under some
> circumstances, you can get away without doing the SC,

Of course, CMPXCHG doesn't have to store either, though it still performs a
locked-write-cycle on x86 if I remember correctly.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-16 12:34    [W:0.184 / U:3.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site