lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 15 Dec 2005 23:46:26 -0800
FromJeremy Higdon <>
SubjectRe: Semantics of smp_mb() [was : Re: [PATCH] Fix RCU race in access of nohz_cpu_mask ]
Roland Dreier got this right.  The purpose of the mmiowb is
to ensure that writes to I/O devices while holding a spinlock
are ordered with respect to writes issued after the original
processor releases and a second processor acquires said
spinlock.

A MMIO read would be sufficient, but is much heavier weight.

On the SGI MIPS-based systems, the "sync" instruction was used.
On the Altix systems, a register on the hub chip is read.

From comments by jejb, we're looking at modifying the mmiowb
API by adding an argument which would be a register to read
from if the architecture in question needs ordering in this
way but does not have a lighter weight mechanism like the Altix
mmiowb.  Since there will now need to be a width indication,
mmiowb will be replaced with mmiowb[bwlq].

jeremy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-16 08:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2008