lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
FromMiles Bader <>
DateThu, 15 Dec 2005 14:24:08 +0900
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
>> Is there a reason you didnt answer the comment about down/up being the
>> usual way computing refers to the operations on counting semaphores but
>> just deleted it ?
>
> up/down is also used in conjunction with mutexes and R/W semaphores, so
> counting semaphores do not have exclusive rights to the terminology.

I suspect that is only the case where the author of the mutex was
accustomed to using semaphores as mutexes before-hand; "up/down" are
rather poor names for mutex operations otherwise.  lock/unlock are much
better.

-Miles
-- 
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
  			-- Walter Hines Page
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-15 06:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2008