Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:55:36 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration |
| |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 06:51:40PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Al Viro wrote: > > > So who should I put as the author? You or Geert (or whatever attributions > > might have been in said big patch)? Incidentally, ADBREQ_RAW had leaked > > into mainline (sans definition) in 2.3.45-pre2, which was Feb 13 2000, i.e. > > more than 1.5 year before your commit, so there's quite a chunk of history > > missing... > > I'd say Geert, but it probably comes from the Mac tree. Anyway, it > wouldn't be such a bad idea to ask him first why it's in his postponed > queue: > > http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-2.6.x-merging/POSTPONED/130-adbraw.diff > > My guess it needs some ack from the ppc people.
It doesn't - behaviour in case when ADBREQ_RAW is not passed in flags had been obviously unchanged. And only m68k passes ADBREQ_RAW in there. So no, it doesn't affect ppc at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |