lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism
    From
    Date

    >
    > You are using the wrong hammer to crack your nut.
    > You should instead approach your problem of why the ARP entry gets lost.
    > For example, you could give as critical priority to your TCP session,
    > but that still won't cure your ARP problem.
    > I would suggest that the best way to cure your arp problem, is to
    > increase the time between arp cache refreshes.

    or turn it around entirely: all traffic is considered important
    unless... and have a bunch of non-critical sockets (like http requests)
    be marked non-critical.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-15 12:50    [W:0.022 / U:0.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site