[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Prevent overriding of Symbols in the Kernel, avoiding Undefined behaviour
    On 12/14/05, Rusty Russell <> wrote:
    > We already do this to resolve (more) symbols, so I don't see it as a
    > problem. However, I believe that lock is redundant here: we need both
    > locks to write the list, but either is sufficient for reading, and we
    > already hold the sem.

    Was just wondering, in that case, if we really need the spinlock in
    resolve_symbol() function, where there exists a spinlock around the
    __find_symbol() function

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-14 06:48    [W:0.025 / U:3.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site