lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Can you please apply the following patch then?
    > > >
    > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
    > >
    > > OK.
    > >
    > > Thus far I have this:
    >
    > Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too?

    Spose so - I don't know what people are using out there.

    > AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the
    > advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make
    > the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain.

    There are a few places in the tree which refuse to compile with 3.1 and 3.2.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-13 10:19    [W:0.042 / U:63.444 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site