Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:05:18 +0100 | | From | Andi Kleen <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation |
| |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > > > Can you please apply the following patch then? > > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement > > OK. > > Thus far I have this:
Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain.
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |