![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
* David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > > > init_MUTEX_LOCKED() > > > DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED() > > > > please kill these two in the simple mutex implementation - they are a > > sign of mutexes used as completions. > > That can be done later. It's not necessary to do it in this particular > patch set. i disagree - it's necessary that we dont build complexities into the 'simple' mutex type, or the whole game starts again. I.e. the 'owner unlocks the mutex' rule must be enforced - which makes DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED() meaningless. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-13 14:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||