lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:48:19AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
    > > > +#define is_mutex_locked(mutex) ((mutex)->state)
    > >
    > > Let's keep the namespace consistent. mutex_is_locked().
    >
    > But that's a poor name: it turns it from a question into a statement:-(

    Ah, but look at it in context of how it's used:

    if (is_mutex_locked())
    That's gramatically incorrect!

    if (mutex_is_locked())
    much better.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-13 13:42    [W:2.368 / U:0.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site