lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] move pm_power_off and pm_idle declaration to common code
From
Date
> >> Does powerpc still build?  A key question is how do we handle architectures
> >> that always want to want to call machine_power_off.
> >
> > I didn't (and can't) check, but it should. IIRC multiple declaration
> > of a variable is OK, as long as at most one has an initializer.
>
> And as long as you don't build with -fno-common.

That seals the argument, since -fno-common is in linux/Makefile.

So the patch wants fixing on powerpc, but I don't feel up to the task.

Somebody with better knowledge of that arch?

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-12 16:11    [W:0.039 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site