[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:30:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But lines 865-866 together with line 846 make most shrink_zone() invocations
> > only run one batch of scan. The numbers become:
> True. Need to go into a huddle with the changelogs, but I have a feeling
> that lines 865 and 866 aren't very important. What happens if we remove
> them?

Maybe the answer is: can we accept to free 15M memory at one time for a 64G zone?
(Or can we simply increase the DEF_PRIORITY?)

btw, maybe it's time to lower the low_mem_reserve.
There should be no need to keep ~50M free memory with the balancing patch.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-02 03:06    [W:0.130 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site