[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/12] mm: supporting variables and functions for balanced zone aging
    On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:30:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > But lines 865-866 together with line 846 make most shrink_zone() invocations
    > > only run one batch of scan. The numbers become:
    > True. Need to go into a huddle with the changelogs, but I have a feeling
    > that lines 865 and 866 aren't very important. What happens if we remove
    > them?

    Maybe the answer is: can we accept to free 15M memory at one time for a 64G zone?
    (Or can we simply increase the DEF_PRIORITY?)

    btw, maybe it's time to lower the low_mem_reserve.
    There should be no need to keep ~50M free memory with the balancing patch.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-02 03:06    [W:0.019 / U:35.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site