Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver | From | David Woodhouse <> | Date | Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:36:39 +0000 |
| |
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 19:02 +0000, Russell King wrote: > We agree to disagree. For example, in all probability, ARM will never > see a TPM chip, yet it's offered for selection. Given that, does it > really make sense to offer it for ARM?
You speak of _probability_. Yes, it makes sense to offer it as an _option_ for ARM. It just doesn't make sense to put it in the defconfig for any of the existing platforms.
Nobody expects 'allyesconfig' to be something you'd actually want to _use_.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |