![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jody McIntyre <scjody@modernduck.com> wrote: > > Can I still send a 2k spinlock fix in ~2 weeks? Bugfixes are of course always welcome - that's the entire reason for having the stabilisation period. > That's the only thing I > really want to get in to 2.6.15. I think it's fair to make exemptions for subsystems which have been neglected, or are flakey, or which are newly-merged, or which have a new batch of maintainers who are struggling to get things back into shape and back into sync with offstream trees. Because a) those subsystems are usually already pretty buggy and b) the team needs extra help to get stuff back into shape asap. I'd view 1394 as only partly-emerged from that state ;) As long as you understand the overall philosophy of what we're trying to do, you should be able to make your own decisions about what's suitable, and when. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-09 23:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||