[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
    On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:00 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

    > > However, I appreciate your preference to separate cleanup from semantic
    > > change. Perhaps this means leaving the ALLOC_CPUSET flag in your
    > > cleanup patch, then one of us following on top of that with a patch to
    > > simplify and fix the cpuset invocation semantics and a second cleanup
    > > patch to remove ALLOC_CPUSET as a separate flag.
    > >
    > That would be good. I'll send off a fresh patch with the
    > ALLOC_WATERMARKS fixed after Rohit gets around to looking over
    > it.

    Nick, your changes have really come out good. Thanks. I think it is
    definitely a good starting point as it maintains all of existing

    I guess now I can argue about why we should keep the watermark low for
    GFP_HIGH ;-)

    Paul, sorry for troubling you with those magic numbers again in the
    original patch...


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-08 19:14    [W:0.021 / U:65.496 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site