[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]: Cleanup of __alloc_pages
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:00 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > However, I appreciate your preference to separate cleanup from semantic
> > change. Perhaps this means leaving the ALLOC_CPUSET flag in your
> > cleanup patch, then one of us following on top of that with a patch to
> > simplify and fix the cpuset invocation semantics and a second cleanup
> > patch to remove ALLOC_CPUSET as a separate flag.
> >
> That would be good. I'll send off a fresh patch with the
> ALLOC_WATERMARKS fixed after Rohit gets around to looking over
> it.

Nick, your changes have really come out good. Thanks. I think it is
definitely a good starting point as it maintains all of existing

I guess now I can argue about why we should keep the watermark low for

Paul, sorry for troubling you with those magic numbers again in the
original patch...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-08 19:14    [W:0.056 / U:9.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site