![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:05:57PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org> writes: > > I don't know if x86_64 is LP64 or LLP64 on Linux, but at least my alpha > > and sparc64 are LP64, so is another PPC64 I use for code validation. > > LPC64 is the recommended model for easier 32 to 64 portability (where > > ints are 32 ; long, longlong, ptrs are 64). > > Are there _any_ (widespread) platforms except Windows that use LLP64? I don't think so, ask google for LLP64 and click the second link (blogs), you will like it :-) Basically, they choose LLP64 because they have declared some structures as LONG (eg: in bitmaps) instead of making them int32 ! I didn't know that they were losers to the point of not understanding a typedef ! This may explain why they stopped supporting alpha long ago... > LP64 seems to be by far the most common in the unix world. it seems so, but I'd be interested in counter-examples too. > -miles > -- > "1971 pickup truck; will trade for guns" Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-08 06:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||