![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>>ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE >>>-CFLAGS += -Os >>>+CFLAGS += -O >>>else >>>CFLAGS += -O2 >>>endif >> >>Sees this undoes part of the benefit, perhaps you should add a >>third option. > > > Even further, I don't see any reason for using -O - the resulting code > is expected to be both bigger and slower than with -Os. > > Is this a workaround for a gcc bug on some platform? Yes, extacly, it is. See other post on this for more details. Still shouldn't be here though. Regards Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com SnapGear -- a CyberGuard Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630 Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-07 05:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||