![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea. Relying on nested faults in oops > is a bit unsafe because it could lead to recursive faults in the worst case. Good point. > Better keep the if Except the condition is wrong. Presence of CR4 could be tested elsewhere though, with the result being the condition here. Maciej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-07 09:40 [W:0.778 / U:0.100 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||