lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 7 Nov 2005 09:38:21 +0000 (GMT)
From"Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.14: CR4 not needed to be inspected on the 486 anymore?
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> I don't think it's a good idea. Relying on nested faults in oops
> is a bit unsafe because it could lead to recursive faults in the worst case. 

 Good point.

> Better keep the if

 Except the condition is wrong.  Presence of CR4 could be tested elsewhere
though, with the result being the condition here.

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-07 09:40    [W:0.778 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans