lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 3 Nov 2005 23:26:49 -0800
FromPaul Jackson <>
SubjectRe: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
Ingo wrote:
> to clearly stress the 'might easily fail' restriction. But if userspace 
> is well-behaved on Andy's systems (which it seems to be), then in 
> practice it should be resizable. 

At first glance, this is the sticky point that jumps out at me.

Andy wrote:
>    My experience is that after some days or weeks of running have gone
>    by, there is no possible way short of a reboot to get pages merged
>    effectively back to any pristine state with the infrastructure that 
>    exists there.

I take it, from what Andy writes, and from my other experience with
similar customers, that his workload is not "well-behaved" in the
sense you hoped for.

After several diverse jobs are run, we cannot, so far as I know,
merge small pages back to big pages.

I have not played with Mel Gorman's Fragmentation Avoidance patches,
so don't know if they would provide a substantial improvement here.
They well might.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-04 07:30    [W:6.904 / U:0.110 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans