![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 11/4/05, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > > You lost me... We have a scenario when a PNP driver is bound to a PNP > device that does not support deactivation. Looking at the proposed PNP > bus suspend code presence of such device will cause suspend process to > fail. Are you saying this is what you want? > Ugh, scratch whatever I wrote earlier. Such devices should be marked with RES_DO_NOT_CHANEG so everything is fine. Sorry about the noise. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-04 16:15 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||