![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 20:26, Michael Krufky wrote: [...] >All I can think of doing next is to have Gene, Don or Perry do a >bisection test on our cvs repo.... checking out different cvs revisions >until we can narrow it down to the day the problem patch was applied. > >::sigh:: A sigh? More like an 'oh fudge' or whatever your fav expletive deleted is... >Who wants to do it? I'll give you detailed instructions if you're > willing. > >Regards, >Mike Can you farm it out, one set of patches to each of us? Or do you want to setup a seperate cvs tree based on the v4l code in 2.6.14.3, and incrementally patch it as we each report its still ok, until it breaks again? I think I'd prefer the latter so we are all near the same page even if it takes 3x longer to arrive at the answer. How many actual patches in terms of dependency groups are there? I know, I coulda went all week without asking that :( -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.36% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-30 06:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||