![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:43:12PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote: > > Looks sane to me. Can you carry this in the ocfs2 tree? > > No problem. Give us a day or two to merge the changes to our > main trees. I think I disagree with Andew here. Having a core patch separate from a new drivers/filesystem/etc.. is always a good idea. It makes reviewing a lot easier and allows independant handling, e.g. merging it earlier than the new driver for some reason - as happened for example with the clear_inode changes we needed earlier for ocfs or the pagevec exports that came in via the reiser4 patches but were needed in mainline for cifs now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-03 17:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||