lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 28 Nov 2005 06:15:29 +0100
FromAndi Kleen <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/7]: Fix for unsafe notifier chain
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:05:22PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:59:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:57:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any options I missed?
> > > 
> > > Stop using the notifier chains from NMI context - it's too hard.  Use a
> > > fixed-size array in the NMI code instead.
> > 
> > Or just don't unregister. That is what I did for the debug notifiers.
> 
> So the thought is to replicate the notifier code in all non-NMI subsystems
> that require it?

The non NMI subsystems just need to get appropiate locking 
(or preferable just use RCU if the notifiers can't sleep) 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-28 06:18    [from the cache]
©2003-2008