![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Sunday 27 November 2005 14:53, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote: > > Hi,> > > > On Saturday 26 November 2005 15:20, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Everybody who saw timing problems with ATI IXP based boards with x86-64 > > > or some Nvidia NForce4 boards please test this patch. Please send > > > success/failure to me.> > > > I try to give your patch a try on the ATI based MSI Megabook S270, today - > > however even with the workaround of "noapic" I had timer drift on resuem from > > ram if the cpu was scaled to a lower frequency when it was suspended.> > But it worked properly before suspend/resume without noapic? Without noapic the timer has about the 2x speed compared to real-time. I only used the machien with noapic since otherwise it is barely useful. Did you want to know if suspend/resume does behave differently without noapic? Yours, -- René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany) http://www.exactcode.de | http://www.t2-project.org +49 (0)30 255 897 45[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-27 14:06 [W:0.823 / U:0.210 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||