lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
    On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:15:48PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:12:28AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Russell King wrote:
    > > >On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:33:02AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > >
    > > >>This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver.
    > > >>
    > > >>Is there any reason why it should be kept?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >Tt's the only driver which works correctly on ARM CPUs. e100 is
    > > >basically buggy. This has been discussed here on lkml and more
    > > >recently on linux-netdev. If anyone has any further questions
    > > >please read the archives of those two lists.
    > >
    > > After reading the archives, one discovers the current status is:
    > >
    > > waiting on ARM folks to test e100
    > >
    > > Latest reference is public message-id <4371A373.6000308@pobox.com>,
    > > which was CC'd to you.
    > >
    > > There is a patch in netdev-2.6.git#e100-sbit and in Andrew's -mm tree
    > > that should solve the ARM problems, and finally allow us to kill
    > > eepro100. But it's waiting for feedback...
    >
    > Well, I've run 2.6.15-rc2 on what I think was the ARM platform which
    > exhibited the problem, but it doesn't show up. However, that's
    > meaningless as it has been literally _years_ (4 or more) since the
    > problem was reported. It's rather unsurprising that I can't reproduce
    > it - I don't even know if I'm using the right processor module!

    Additionally, looking back at my 30th June 2004 message, I don't
    think I've even managed sufficient testing to make any claim of
    working-ness or non-working-ness against either driver.

    The test was merely a "did it successfully BOOTP" because I can't
    get it to mount and run /sbin/init from the jffs2 rootfs which
    2.5.70 was perfectly happy to earlier today. However, the
    failure point seemed to be when NFS tried to use the card.

    Whether that means I was or was not using BOOTP back in 2004...
    your guess is as good as mine.

    Anyway, that's the end of the issue as far as I'm concerned.

    --
    Russell King
    Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
    maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-23 23:26    [W:0.027 / U:150.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site