lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] SMP alternatives


On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> I don't think I see the point. This would let you optimize for the
> "multi-threaded, but hasn't created any threads yet" or even
> "multi-threaded, but not right now" cases. But those really aren't the
> interesting case to optimize for - that's the equivalent of supporting
> CPU hotplug.

NO.

There is not a _single_ compiler that is multi-threaded, and I'd argue
that there probably never will be. It's pointless.

There's a _lot_ of really performance-sensitive stuff that will NEVER EVER
be threaded. You may run a hundred copies of them at the same time, but
every single copy will be single-threaded.

And this will optimize that case in a BIG way.

This is _not_ about "CPU hotplug". This is _not_ about "threaded apps
before they are threaded". This is all about the fact that serious
computation is done single-threaded, and anybody who thinks that
single-threading is going away is so totally out to lunch that it's not
even fun.

And yes, Sun will die. Single-thread performance matters a hell of a lot,
and any company that bets that it doesn't, is a failure.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site