Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:08:51 -0500 | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: Resume from swsusp stopped working with 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc1 |
| |
On 11/22/05, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote: > Hi! > > > > > If a clueless users voice counts for anything: I couldn't agree more. > > > > > > > > A failed resume is a near catastrophy if you use and trust swsusp. And > > > > how could it ever be useful if you don't? > > > > > > Failed resume is only as bad as powerfail. > > > > So? I don't like powerfails either. Could you please answer this > > question - what pros of having resume process time out do you > > envision? What problems does it help to solve? > > No advantages, really.. except that it keeps suspend and resume paths > similar, and keeps the code simple. I'll want to call this from > userland and I'd hate to have two different calls or call with > parameter. >
Passing a parameter from userspace - is it so hard? Oh well, if you prefer to leave this as a time bomb ready to explode - so be it.
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |