Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:20:14 -0700 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition |
| |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > In short: NO_IRQ _is_ 0. Always has been. It's the only sane value. And > btw, there is no need for that #define at all, exactly because the way you > test for "is this no irq" is by doing "!dev->irq".
Could you at least take the first patch that checks that we don't go outside the bounds of the irq_desc array? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |