lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: what is our answer to ZFS?
El Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:19:59 +0100,
Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> escribió:

> question will be easily answered. I still haven't found the time to
> dig for all the information underneith the marketing blur.

Me neither, at now that we are talking about marketing impact, has people
run benchmarks on it? (I'd do it myself but downloading a iso with a dialup
link takes some time 8)

I've found numbers against other kernels:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-perform/2005/11/18/0000.html
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/roch?entry=zfs_to_ufs_performance_comparison
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/erickustarz?entry=fs_perf_201_postmark
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/erickustarz?entry=fs_perf_102_filesystem_bw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-21 13:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site