lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: what is our answer to ZFS?
    El Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:19:59 +0100,
    Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> escribió:

    > question will be easily answered. I still haven't found the time to
    > dig for all the information underneith the marketing blur.

    Me neither, at now that we are talking about marketing impact, has people
    run benchmarks on it? (I'd do it myself but downloading a iso with a dialup
    link takes some time 8)

    I've found numbers against other kernels:
    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-perform/2005/11/18/0000.html
    http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/roch?entry=zfs_to_ufs_performance_comparison
    http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/erickustarz?entry=fs_perf_201_postmark
    http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/erickustarz?entry=fs_perf_102_filesystem_bw
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-21 13:01    [W:0.021 / U:3.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site