![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > The fact is, 0 _is_ special. Not just for hardware, but because 0 has a > > magical meaning as "false" in the C language. > > I don't agree, irq 0 has been a valid irq on a number of platforms for > ages The point is, it's _not_ a valid irq for 99.9% of all machines and drivers that have ever been tested. Also, if you don't agree that 0 is special in the C language, then you're just strictly _wrong_. It's an undeniable fact that zero _is_ special. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-21 22:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||