[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed
    VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:

    >Steve French wrote:
    >Well I would be surprised the "cat >> titi" command does any of this
    >byte range lock. If the "create and later rewrite the same file"
    >sequence fails, with a simple cat command (cat > titi ... ^D; cat >>
    >titi), how can it works with complicated applications?
    Make sure that you let me know if your cat example works when mounted
    with the relatively new "noperm" mount option on the client. At least
    then we will know whether we are looking at a problem with access
    control on the server (ntfs acls) or client (unix mode bits and the
    .permission entry point)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-21 22:33    [W:0.027 / U:8.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site