lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
    Yasunori Goto wrote:
    >>>One other thing, if we decide to take the zones approach, it would have
    >>>no other side benefits for the kernel. It would be for hotplug only and
    >>>I don't think even the large page users would get much benefit.
    >>>
    >>
    >>Hugepage users? They can be satisfied with ZONE_REMOVABLE too. If you're
    >>talking about other higher-order users, I still think we can't guarantee
    >>past about order 1 or 2 with Mel's patch and they simply need to have
    >>some other ways to do things.
    >
    >
    > Hmmm. I don't see at this point.
    > Why do you think ZONE_REMOVABLE can satisfy for hugepage.
    > At leaset, my ZONE_REMOVABLE patch doesn't any concern about
    > fragmentation.
    >

    Well I think it can satisfy hugepage allocations simply because
    we can be reasonably sure of being able to free contiguous regions.
    Of course it will be memory no longer easily reclaimable, same as
    the case for the frag patches. Nor would be name ZONE_REMOVABLE any
    longer be the most appropriate!

    But my point is, the basic mechanism is there and is workable.
    Hugepages and memory unplug are the two main reasons for IBM to be
    pushing this AFAIKS.

    --
    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

    Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-02 09:44    [W:0.023 / U:88.584 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site