lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PI BUG with -rt13

* david singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com> wrote:

> >both rt_mutex_free() and rt_mutex_set_owner() must be called with the
> >proper locking. David?
>
> Yes, the lock needs to be protected by the robust semaphore.
> The locking order is:
>
> mmap_sem to protect the vma that holds the pthread_mutex
>
> robust_sem to protect the futex_mutex chain.
>
> futex_mutex - the rt_mutex associated with the
> pthread_mutex.

well, also lock->wait_lock and lock->pi_lock. The act of making another
thread the owner of this particular mutex must be performed carefully.
Check out rt.c to see what locking dependencies there are. (We can also
do a lockless cmpxchg for unlocked mutexes, under certain
circumstances.)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-18 18:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site