Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:03:05 -0800 (PST) | From | Patrick Mochel <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp |
| |
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:10:52PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past > > > year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers. > > > > Do you mean swsusp is actually supposed to work? Suspend-to-ram, > > suspend-to-disk or both? > > Both. -to-ram depends on your video chip, but to-disk should work just > fine. If not, please report bugs.
swsusp has nothing to do with suspend-to-ram. swsusp is a platform-independent implementation of suspend-to-disk. STR is very-platform dependent. Please see the file:
Documentation/power/states.txt
for more info.
Pat
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |