![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes: > > That's the problem. I found out that one ioctl might sleep holding the > sem and won't be woken up until another process calls another ioctl to > wake it up. But unfortunately, the one waking up the sleeper will block > on the sem. (the killer was tty_wait_until_sent) You should have looked into mainline first. The semaphore is already gone because it wasn't even needed anymore. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-16 06:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||