![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 12:11 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:20 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > It seems most problems with 4k stacks are already resolved. > > > > > > > > I'd like to see this patch to always use 4k stacks in -mm now for > > > > finding any remaining problems before submitting this patch for 2.6.16. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has the block layer been remade to a serial approach? > > > > yes. > > Not in mainline it hasn't. well the patch was for -mm ;) > > Are there any recent benchmarks of 4kb vs 8kb stacks? not sure; I do know that it very much helps java (many more threads possible) and the VM (far less order 1 allocs). In addition the 4Kb allocation can be satisfied with the per cpu list of free 4Kb pages, while obviously an order 1 cannot and has to go global. > Is anyone shipping 4kb stack kernels? Both Fedora and RHEL are shipping this for all 2.6 based versions (eg FC2 and all later, RHEL4) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-14 12:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||