[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
On Sul, 2005-11-13 at 20:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> It's a bad hack anyways. Better would be probably to use a uncached WC write.
> I would rather use that.

I'm not clear that anything but lock operations have the required
guarantee of atomicity relative to bus masters which are not processors.
Especially so on intel.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-13 20:13    [W:0.085 / U:6.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site