[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    On Sul, 2005-11-13 at 20:00 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > It's a bad hack anyways. Better would be probably to use a uncached WC write.
    > I would rather use that.

    I'm not clear that anything but lock operations have the required
    guarantee of atomicity relative to bus masters which are not processors.
    Especially so on intel.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-13 20:13    [W:0.018 / U:17.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site