![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:09:38 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > What about my second suggestion to always use libusual in the two > drivers instead of having two code paths in each of them? I don't see how you would be able to mandate libusual, since it adds (a small amount of) bloat. I foresee some distributions building without it for years. Debian is likely to take such course. We certainly can apply such a patch and tell all complainers to suck it up, but I am not sure if that would be embraced by distro developers. I do not want to risk anything that may derail acceptance into Linus' tree. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-11-11 09:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||