Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: New Linux Development Model | From | Ian Kumlien <> | Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:47:39 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 19:29 +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2005 15:10, Mark Lord wrote: > [snip] > > But things just got WAY more complicated for most users of ipw2200. > > Sure, they can ignore us and just continue to run their old vendor > > kernels. But this means they don't get up-to-date kernels with > > bug fixes and security fixes. And more importantly to LKML, > > we've now just cut off a potentially large crowd of kernel-testers. > > > > Ugh. Ugly. > > I completely agree with this assessment, I was merely defending the "linux > development process" which I do not believe to be at fault here.
It isn't, this started as a mail from someone, and was continued because ipw* and ieee* things was mentioned. I really hope that a newer version is merged... It can be branded experimental and all... =)
-- Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |