Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:54:12 +0000 | From | Alexander Clouter <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice' |
| |
Con,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> [20051111 02:48:57 +1100]: > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:11, Alexander Clouter wrote: > > The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it. > > This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a > > 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '1'; meaning nice'd processes > > are not counted towards the 'business' caclulation. > > And just for the last time I'll argue that the default should be 0. I have yet > to discuss this with any laptop user who thinks that 1 is the correct default > for ondemand. > ....resubmitting with alternative defaults....
Cheers
Alex
> Regards, > Con
-- ____________________________________ / "An ounce of prevention is worth a \ \ pound of purge." / ------------------------------------ \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |