[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:11, Alexander Clouter wrote:
    > The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it.
    > This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
    > 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '1'; meaning nice'd processes
    > are not counted towards the 'business' caclulation.

    And just for the last time I'll argue that the default should be 0. I have yet
    to discuss this with any laptop user who thinks that 1 is the correct default
    for ondemand.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-10 16:52    [W:0.019 / U:34.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site