[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative/ondemand: invert meaning of 'ignore nice'
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 02:11, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> The use of the 'ignore_nice' sysfs file is confusing to anyone using it.
> This removes the sysfs file 'ignore_nice' and in its place creates a
> 'ignore_nice_load' entry which defaults to '1'; meaning nice'd processes
> are not counted towards the 'business' caclulation.

And just for the last time I'll argue that the default should be 0. I have yet
to discuss this with any laptop user who thinks that 1 is the correct default
for ondemand.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-10 16:52    [W:0.088 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site