lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromMichael Buesch <>
SubjectRe: Would I be violating the GPL?
DateTue, 1 Nov 2005 20:00:20 +0100
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:49, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> A supplier of a PCI mezzanine digital IO card has provided a linux 2.4
> driver as source code.  They have provided this code source with a
> license stating I won't redistribute it in anyway.
> My concern is that if I build this code into a module, I won't be able
> to distribute it to customers without violating either the GPL (by not
> distributing the source code), or the proprietary source code license
> as currently imposed by the supplier.
> From what I have read, this concern is only valid if the binary module
> is considered to be a 'derived work' of the kernel.  The module source
> directly includes the following kernel headers :

Take the code and write a specification for the device.
Should be fairly easy.
Someone else will pick up the spec and write a clean GPLed driver.

Like these, without the reverse engineering part:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_wall#Computer_science

-- 
Greetings Michael.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-01 20:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008