Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | Date | Tue, 1 Nov 2005 07:29:33 -0800 | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | | Subject | [PATCH] fix remaining list_for_each_safe_rcu in -mm |
| |
Hello!
I missed a use of list_for_each_rcu_safe() in -mm tree. Here is a patch to fix it.
Signed-off-by: <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
--- ipmi_msghandler.c | 5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1-safe_rcu/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c --- linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c 2005-11-01 06:44:09.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.14-rc5-mm1-safe_rcu/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c 2005-11-01 07:00:50.000000000 -0800 @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ int ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user_t user) int i; unsigned long flags; struct cmd_rcvr *rcvr; - struct list_head *entry1, *entry2; + struct list_head *entry1; struct cmd_rcvr *rcvrs = NULL; user->valid = 1; @@ -813,8 +813,7 @@ int ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user_t user) * synchronize_rcu()) then free everything in that list. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->cmd_rcvrs_lock, flags); - list_for_each_safe_rcu(entry1, entry2, &intf->cmd_rcvrs) { - rcvr = list_entry(entry1, struct cmd_rcvr, link); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry1, &intf->cmd_rcvrs, link) { if (rcvr->user == user) { list_del_rcu(&rcvr->link); rcvr->next = rcvrs; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |