lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 9 Oct 2005 16:38:07 +0800
FromCoywolf Qi Hunt <>
SubjectRe: "stable" vs "security stable"
On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> > On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> > It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
> > "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.
>
> Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..
>

Better be "stable" and "base". 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, 2.6.13
is the latest base.

> > (you want stable@kernel.org to replace security@kernel.org too?)
>
> You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)

My fault. I didn't realise stable@kernel.org exist, and CCed the wrong
list security@kernel.org.

>
> > What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies
> > something wrong, and need to revert.
>
> Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...

I mean `patch -R'.
--
Coywolf Qi Hunt
http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-09 06:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2008