Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: "stable" vs "security stable" | | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | | | Date | Sun, 09 Oct 2005 04:26:15 -0400 |
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
> "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.
Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..
> (you want stable@kernel.org to replace security@kernel.org too?)
You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)
> What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies
> something wrong, and need to revert.
Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |