lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: "stable" vs "security stable"
From Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ...
DateSun, 09 Oct 2005 04:26:15 -0400
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:

> It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
> "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.

Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..

> (you want stable@kernel.org to replace security@kernel.org too?)

You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)

> What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies
> something wrong, and need to revert.

Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-09 06:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008