lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 9 Oct 2005 01:09:37 -0700
FromChris Wright <>
SubjectRe: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable"
* Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@gmail.com) wrote:
> I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> since the security stable came.

It's stable, not security stable.  It does contain security fixes
sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel
stability.

> Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one
> wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but
> 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I
> suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable".

Perhaps a column B for base.  Or just link to ketchup and be done with it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-09 06:12    [W:0.149 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans