Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Oct 2005 02:06:25 +0100 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] gfp flags annotations |
| |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:13:15AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote: > > > a) typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t; > > > > Btw, since you did a typedef, any reason why it isn't marked __bitwise > > too? It would seem that all valid uses of it are bit tests with predefined > > values, ie a __bitwise restriction would seem very natural, no? > > See [*] in Al's RFC. > > The amount of endian warnings on allmodconfig is in >10K range. gfp_t > ones would simply be lost in noise.
I've done that in the latter chunks, will send the next few in about half an hour... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |