lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] gfp flags annotations
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:13:15AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> > > a) typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t;
> >
> > Btw, since you did a typedef, any reason why it isn't marked __bitwise
> > too? It would seem that all valid uses of it are bit tests with predefined
> > values, ie a __bitwise restriction would seem very natural, no?
>
> See [*] in Al's RFC.
>
> The amount of endian warnings on allmodconfig is in >10K range. gfp_t
> ones would simply be lost in noise.

I've done that in the latter chunks, will send the next few in about half an
hour...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-09 03:09    [W:0.289 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site