[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] gfp flags annotations
    On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:13:15AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote:
    > > > a) typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t;
    > >
    > > Btw, since you did a typedef, any reason why it isn't marked __bitwise
    > > too? It would seem that all valid uses of it are bit tests with predefined
    > > values, ie a __bitwise restriction would seem very natural, no?
    > See [*] in Al's RFC.
    > The amount of endian warnings on allmodconfig is in >10K range. gfp_t
    > ones would simply be lost in noise.

    I've done that in the latter chunks, will send the next few in about half an
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-09 03:09    [W:0.019 / U:7.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site