Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 9 Oct 2005 05:13:15 +0400 | | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] gfp flags annotations |
| |
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Al Viro wrote: > > a) typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t; > > Btw, since you did a typedef, any reason why it isn't marked __bitwise > too? It would seem that all valid uses of it are bit tests with predefined > values, ie a __bitwise restriction would seem very natural, no?
See [*] in Al's RFC.
The amount of endian warnings on allmodconfig is in >10K range. gfp_t ones would simply be lost in noise.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |