![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi Nick. On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 20:14, Nick Piggin wrote: > Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net> > > > > This patch removes the dependency that swap suspend currently has on > > PageReserved. In the places where PageReserved is currently set and > > cleared, we also set and clear PageNosave, and in swap suspend itself, > > we only reference PageNosave. The ongoing effort at freeing PageReserved > > thus achieves another step forward. > > > > Any reason you can't use page_is_ram directly? I would rather you > do this than moving swsusp specific flags out into the wider tree. > The reason is that these flags now become just as hard to kill as > PageReserved is. > > You'll have to slightly modify i386's page_is_ram, because it > appears that you'll actually want > > 'page_is_ram(pfn) && !(bad_ppro && page_kills_ppro(pfn))' Thanks for the suggestion! I suppose we could do something like what you are suggesting. I'll take a look. I'm not promising to do it immediately though - too busy trying to finish off Suspend2 at the mo. > Thanks, glad someone is looking into this! Always glad to be of service! Nigel > Nick -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-07 03:38 [W:2.296 / U:0.070 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||